<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firesheep &#8211; On Your Wifi Hijacking Your Interwebs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catcubed.com/2010/10/30/firesheep-on-your-wifi-hijacking-your-interwebs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/10/30/firesheep-on-your-wifi-hijacking-your-interwebs/</link>
	<description>web design, online health care, art, brains, minds, and inbetween</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: neightd0g</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/10/30/firesheep-on-your-wifi-hijacking-your-interwebs/comment-page-1/#comment-3877</link>
		<dc:creator>neightd0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1351#comment-3877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you cat cubed. This is very well written and I was able to use it to actually get the attention of my facebook friends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you cat cubed. This is very well written and I was able to use it to actually get the attention of my facebook friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/10/30/firesheep-on-your-wifi-hijacking-your-interwebs/comment-page-1/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1351#comment-3853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, I fixed the typo.

Also sure a SOCKS proxy alone isn&#039;t secure but isn&#039;t it secure with a SSH tunnel?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I fixed the typo.</p>
<p>Also sure a SOCKS proxy alone isn&#8217;t secure but isn&#8217;t it secure with a SSH tunnel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rubin110</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/10/30/firesheep-on-your-wifi-hijacking-your-interwebs/comment-page-1/#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>rubin110</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1351#comment-3852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WAP != WPA.

WPA2 PSK encrypts each connection differently, so sniffy the air is not all that easily possible. All that aside it doesn&#039;t stop someone from just simply running a dump on a gateway (like the network gateway you&#039;re using, or the wifi access point) between you and the internet.

SOCKS isn&#039;t secure at all, Firesheep wont look for that sort of traffic, but someone else&#039;s tool might.

I think my project for this weekend is to get this running off of my phone...

http://jonty.co.uk/idiocy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAP != WPA.</p>
<p>WPA2 PSK encrypts each connection differently, so sniffy the air is not all that easily possible. All that aside it doesn&#8217;t stop someone from just simply running a dump on a gateway (like the network gateway you&#8217;re using, or the wifi access point) between you and the internet.</p>
<p>SOCKS isn&#8217;t secure at all, Firesheep wont look for that sort of traffic, but someone else&#8217;s tool might.</p>
<p>I think my project for this weekend is to get this running off of my phone&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://jonty.co.uk/idiocy" rel="nofollow">http://jonty.co.uk/idiocy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
