<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Open Source Fonts &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catcubed.com/2010/05/20/comparing-open-source-fonts-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/05/20/comparing-open-source-fonts-part-2/</link>
	<description>web design, online health care, art, brains, minds, and inbetween</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/05/20/comparing-open-source-fonts-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3784</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1298#comment-3784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jack for the education! Though obviously you and I have a massive disagreement about who should choose the font.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jack for the education! Though obviously you and I have a massive disagreement about who should choose the font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/05/20/comparing-open-source-fonts-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1298#comment-3783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your vision is very simplistic. Let me explain it to you:

There are 3 types of cleartype: WinXP&#039;s Cleartype, Windows Vista&#039;s Cleartype and Windows 7&#039;s Cleartype (the same as Windows Vista) and Windows 7&#039; DirectWrite Cleartype.

By font rendering DNA:

Internet Explorer v6 to v8: unknown + cleartype
Internet Explorer v9: unknown + cleartype + directwrite
Chrome: freetype + skia + cleartype
Firefox v3: freetype + cairo + cleartype
Firefox v4: freetype + cairo + harfbuzz + cleartype + directwrite
Safari: quartz or cleartype (by default in recent versions is cleartype)

As you see very complicated. The best rendering is with Windows 7 + Firefox 4. The worst is Chrome, awful font rendering!

Directwrite on windows is an improvement but only Firefox 4 and Internet Explorer will be using it.

I never use fonts as specified by the web designer. I always override the defaults and choose to use my own fonts.

The best fonts for windows are fonts designed specially for windows. In Windows 7 case is Segoe.

The worst about web fonts is that they will not use neither hinting or kerning. Web fonts are unnecessary. Let the choose the font. It will always be the best solution, since the designer can&#039;t control everything given the diversity of rendering alternatives, display/monitor quality and size, and users&#039; eye problems.

You should lobby the web browsers manufactures to make it easier for their users to choose their own font!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your vision is very simplistic. Let me explain it to you:</p>
<p>There are 3 types of cleartype: WinXP&#8217;s Cleartype, Windows Vista&#8217;s Cleartype and Windows 7&#8242;s Cleartype (the same as Windows Vista) and Windows 7&#8242; DirectWrite Cleartype.</p>
<p>By font rendering DNA:</p>
<p>Internet Explorer v6 to v8: unknown + cleartype<br />
Internet Explorer v9: unknown + cleartype + directwrite<br />
Chrome: freetype + skia + cleartype<br />
Firefox v3: freetype + cairo + cleartype<br />
Firefox v4: freetype + cairo + harfbuzz + cleartype + directwrite<br />
Safari: quartz or cleartype (by default in recent versions is cleartype)</p>
<p>As you see very complicated. The best rendering is with Windows 7 + Firefox 4. The worst is Chrome, awful font rendering!</p>
<p>Directwrite on windows is an improvement but only Firefox 4 and Internet Explorer will be using it.</p>
<p>I never use fonts as specified by the web designer. I always override the defaults and choose to use my own fonts.</p>
<p>The best fonts for windows are fonts designed specially for windows. In Windows 7 case is Segoe.</p>
<p>The worst about web fonts is that they will not use neither hinting or kerning. Web fonts are unnecessary. Let the choose the font. It will always be the best solution, since the designer can&#8217;t control everything given the diversity of rendering alternatives, display/monitor quality and size, and users&#8217; eye problems.</p>
<p>You should lobby the web browsers manufactures to make it easier for their users to choose their own font!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.marekventur.de &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Font Directory in a single zip-file - Notizen und Informationen</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/05/20/comparing-open-source-fonts-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.marekventur.de &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Font Directory in a single zip-file - Notizen und Informationen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1298#comment-3740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Please remember to check first, whether your choosen font is readable at a given size. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Please remember to check first, whether your choosen font is readable at a given size. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2010/05/20/comparing-open-source-fonts-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 08:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/?p=1298#comment-3657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shemanarev has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antigrain.com/research/font_rasterization/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;technical explanation&lt;/a&gt; of why Windows&#039; type hinting does so badly at preserving glyph shapes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shemanarev has a <a href="http://www.antigrain.com/research/font_rasterization/" rel="nofollow">technical explanation</a> of why Windows&#8217; type hinting does so badly at preserving glyph shapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
