<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Gonzalez&#8217;s Anti-Obama Diatribe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catcubed.com/2008/02/28/matt-gonzalezs-anti-obama-diatribe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catcubed.com/2008/02/28/matt-gonzalezs-anti-obama-diatribe/</link>
	<description>web design, online health care, art, brains, minds, and inbetween</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2008/02/28/matt-gonzalezs-anti-obama-diatribe/comment-page-1/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/2008/02/28/matt-gonzalezs-anti-obama-diatribe/#comment-1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t solely blame Nader for Gore&#039;s loss in 2000. Florida was one bif fiasco after another. Frankly, I think the big problem was that it was soo close to begin with, and much of that was Gore&#039;s fault as he was incredibly wooden and uncharismatic in almost every speech. Nowadays Gore&#039;s different -- not sure what happened that turned Mr Inconvenient Truth around.

Still my point remains valid. Nader&#039;s 2000 run is at least partially responsible for Bush being in office. And in any case, our choices now between Republican and Democrat are extremely and obviously different. For Nader to claim otherwise is shear blindness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t solely blame Nader for Gore&#8217;s loss in 2000. Florida was one bif fiasco after another. Frankly, I think the big problem was that it was soo close to begin with, and much of that was Gore&#8217;s fault as he was incredibly wooden and uncharismatic in almost every speech. Nowadays Gore&#8217;s different &#8212; not sure what happened that turned Mr Inconvenient Truth around.</p>
<p>Still my point remains valid. Nader&#8217;s 2000 run is at least partially responsible for Bush being in office. And in any case, our choices now between Republican and Democrat are extremely and obviously different. For Nader to claim otherwise is shear blindness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinker</title>
		<link>http://catcubed.com/2008/02/28/matt-gonzalezs-anti-obama-diatribe/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catcubed.com/2008/02/28/matt-gonzalezs-anti-obama-diatribe/#comment-1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blaming Nader for 2000 seems overly simplistic; what about the other candidates running?

http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm

http://www.cagreens.org/alameda/city/0803myth/myth.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blaming Nader for 2000 seems overly simplistic; what about the other candidates running?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cagreens.org/alameda/city/0803myth/myth.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cagreens.org/alameda/city/0803myth/myth.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
